From his Instapundit Substack submit:
So the surprising pro-genocide/pro-Palestinian marches at prime Ivy League faculties have put their administrations into a reasonably pickle. They need to escape duty for pupil speech, however their efforts to plead “free speech” ring hole, once they’ve been eagerly policing pupil—and college—speech for years….
However as a lot as I get pleasure from seeing these individuals stew within the juices of their hypocrisy—and imagine me, get pleasure from it I do—it’s nonetheless true … that free speech rules, and the First Modification the place it applies, forestall issues like a selective ban on anti-semitism, or on “advocacy of genocide” or no matter.
The proposals by varied critics to control campus speech in response are a foul concept, although there may be one upside: The robust help for campus free speech that used to exist was mainly developed as a software to guard leftists on campus from populist or conservative retribution. Maybe this may have an identical impact.
He goes on to supply a considerable, diversified, and bold listing of proposed cures.