I first encountered Sliman Mansour, whose work painting the each day and historic struggles of the Palestinian folks, final yr at Artwork Cairo within the pharaonic enormity of the Grand Egyptian Museum. The occasion introduced collectively a few of the most acclaimed painters, photographers, graffiti artists, and different creatives from throughout the Center East. Mansour, who has famously helped to form the up to date artwork of Palestine for over half a century, was taking part in a dialogue about censorship and violence in opposition to artists and journalists.
At the moment, Mansour’s panel was contemplating the difficulty of future assaults on artists by the lens of people who had already occurred. Initially soft-spoken, his tone turned fiery in response to a different panellist who recommended that artists ought to toe the road in response to governmental censorship as a result of one couldn’t produce artwork if imprisoned or lifeless. This was unacceptable to Mansour, who asserted that it was the job of the artist to create artwork truthfully whatever the penalties.
After I spoke with Mansour nearly precisely one yr later in January 2024, for Palestinians the matter was as soon as once more not historic or hypothetical, however all too current: The variety of journalists and artists killed was persevering with to skyrocket amid the most recent eruption of violence.
“I’m sad and angry,” Mansour advised me once I requested him concerning the excessive charge of journalist casualties. “But it fits the thinking of the Israelis. For them, the narrative is very important. And who tells the narrative — it should be them only, because that’s the truth for them. Anybody who speaks another narrative should be put in prison. Or now they are killed.”
Mansour spoke with me by way of Zoom from his residence in Jerusalem, with the tip to the violence nowhere in sight. He smiled amicably all through our discuss, however his eyes have been unhappy and he appeared considerably drained.
After I requested him concerning the ambiance in Jerusalem, he thought of the query for just a few lengthy moments, then shrugged. “It’s very tense,” he stated, “but there’s no physical threat [in Jerusalem]. It’s only tense because of the war and so on.”
That “and so on” was doing plenty of heavy lifting.
A lifetime of creative resistance
Seventy-seven-year-old Sliman Mansour has spent half a century expressing the perseverance and resistance of the Palestinians by his portray. Born in rural Birzeit earlier than spending his early life in Bethlehem and Jerusalem, his youth was marked by what he noticed because the energetic erasure of Palestinian identification; varied components of Palestinian tradition, such because the flag and even its colors, have been repressed or outright banned. In 1973 he co-founded the League of Palestinian Artists, which introduced a brand new sense of political urgency to the artwork of Palestine. Since then his singular fashion — which fuses components of realism, summary expressionism, and Surrealism — has given rise to a few of the most powerfully emotive photos to emerge from the motion’s cultural opposition to oppression.
Mansour’s most recognisable works converse on to the plight of Palestinians. In Rituals Beneath Occupation, a sea of forlorn folks carry a cross, the pillar of which is a Palestinian flag that stretches off into the horizon. In Perseverance and Hope, a trio in conventional Palestinian costume appears up at a dove, their fingers sure behind their backs, the backdrop a collage of horrible calamity. And naturally, there’s Camel of Hardship, one in every of Mansour’s earliest works to seek out widespread acclaim, which portrays a person staggering ahead with the burden of Jerusalem on his again.
The persistence of ‘sumud’
There’s an nearly pastoral stoicism to Mansour’s work that implores contemplation relatively than cries out for consideration. These work are a few of the most internationally recognised works to current an idea referred to as sumud, a Palestinian idea that has additionally been captured by artists and writers akin to Ismail Shammouth, Mahmoud Darwish, Issam Badr and lots of others.
“The meaning of it in English is steadfastness,” defined Mansour. “For me, sumud is to not forget who we are and to fight all the time for our liberation. Not to give in to the demands of Israel — that if we want to live in this land, we have to live like a second-class people. That is mainly what Israel wants of us — to accept that they are the rulers of this land. Sumud, for me, means that I don’t agree with that. And I will fight that. That — in short — is the meaning of sumud.”
And within the case of Mansour’s artwork, that struggle is characterised by existence relatively than violence. His portray, Reminiscence of Locations, for instance, exhibits a person wearing conventional Palestinian garb standing earlier than a portray of an olive grove. The destruction of Palestinian olive groves on the a part of Israeli settlers has been a fierce level of competition in recent times, and Mansour’s meta-portrayal of such a grove — which we presume has been destroyed, for the previous man is standing earlier than a portray relatively than precise timber — insists that the view think about the obliteration of Palestinian identification.
“A painting shouldn’t be full of force and bloody violence. If I paint just a beautiful landscape or people working in the field, it’s part of the sumud thinking.”
Pink, inexperienced, black, and white
Within the Nineteen Eighties, Mansour was among the many artists who started utilizing what’s immediately a widely known image of the Palestinian motion — the watermelon — after Israel handed laws censoring political artwork.
“They gave us rules like that we should not paint in certain colours,” stated Mansour. “That we should not paint in red, green, black, and white. This rule was published in newspapers and everywhere, including in Israel.”
In line with Mansour, when Israeli authorities asserted the color ban, painter Issam Badr requested if the colors might nonetheless be used to color flowers. No, stated an officer, flowers have been forbidden. Nothing in pink, inexperienced, and black. Not even a watermelon.
“They wanted to fight the notion of a Palestinian identity,” defined Mansour. “As a result of our existence right here, for them, is ‘antisemitic’. That we exist, solely. It’s not what we do — simply our existence right here is one thing that they hate. It doesn’t match their narrative about Israel. What are these folks doing right here? We got here to a land that needs to be empty. So our existence right here is one thing that makes them offended. Existence as employees — that we work for them within the fields or in factories and so forth — that’s okay. However existence, existence as a nationwide identification, as Palestinians — that’s what makes them mad.
“And that’s the reason they forbid us to paint in these colours. Because these colours are the colours of the Palestinian flag and the flag is a symbol of the people.”
As a result of the colors of a watermelon examined the bounds of the ban, it turned a logo of resistance amongst artists and is now generally displayed at pro-Palestinian protests and by supporters on-line.
After I advised Mansour that the concept of banning colors from a painter made about as a lot sense as banning a musician from taking part in sure notes, he nodded, including that portray in opposition to the ban might even have very actual penalties.
“In 1982 to ’84, many artists painted everything in red, green, black, and white,” he stated. “A landscape, a portrait — anything. And in 1984, an artist from Gaza painted the Palestinian flag and they put him in prison for six months. His name is Fathi Ghabin. He’s now in Gaza running away from the bombs and so on, but he spent six months imprisoned in ‘84.”
Mansour recollects that the ban even impressed quite a few Israeli artists to again their Palestinian counterparts by collaborating on exhibitions held all through the early Nineteen Eighties.
“A group of Israeli left-wing artists came to Ramallah to support us and we became friends with many of them and we started making exhibitions,” defined Mansour, “and always the main title of the exhibition was, Down with the Occupation, and, For a Two-State Solution, and things like that. I understand the feelings of the Israeli artists who came to support us at that time. They were very embarrassed. They told us very frankly that they were embarrassed.”
The risks of contradicting the narrative
There was a traditionally excessive variety of journalists killed within the newest battle on Gaza, together with scores of writers, poets, and different artists. Mansour asserts that that is all a part of an effort on the a part of Israel to not solely diminish Palestinian tradition however remove threats to an enforced narrative.
“The whole idea of Israel is narrative,” stated Mansour. “It’s a story, and they are building over that — stories, stories — and they want to keep these stories alive, and they hate anybody who tells another story. So that’s why they hate writers and poets and people who speak another side of the story. And now the journalists.”
And he’s fast to level out that the present violence is way from the primary occasion, and that these wordsmiths have confronted even better retaliation than the painters each immediately and prior to now.
Mansour famous the assassination of writer and politician Ghassan Kanafani, who alongside along with his niece was killed by a automobile bomb in 1972, with the Israeli intelligence company Mossad claiming accountability.
“They were afraid of artists who dealt with the mass media, newspapers, and so on,” Mansour recalled. “ A visual artist was not such a great threat to them. They were angry with the people who wrote.”
The wrestle for humanity
It’s no secret that there’s a stark narrative divide dominating the query of Palestine and Israel. After I requested Mansour how we will overcome this division, he stated that it should begin with the essential recognition of human rights.
“In the event that they settle for our existence then there’s one other manner of connection. If Israelis respect our existence right here and settle for it, then it might be a lot simpler to speak to one another and to make a bridge between these narratives.
“We have to decide first that everybody has the same rights here. We have to come to some kind of agreement.”
How, I questioned, can that be achieved?
“It’s a big question,” Mansour stated, “However on the finish, I believe our struggle is to rehumanise ourselves. There’s a sort of dehumanisation of the Palestinian folks — that these folks, the Palestinians, are usually not totally human beings. They’re lower than human beings, in order that they don’t deserve full rights and so we will take the land and we will kill them. The formulation could be very clear.
“I believe the folks of the world ought to perceive that we don’t struggle as a result of we wish to struggle. We hate to struggle, even. However we’ve got to. It’s like a cage that we’re put in, and we’ve got to get out of that cage. It’s a lure and historical past put us on this lure, ranging from the massive wars. England, France, and all these imperialist states needed to create a state right here, they usually write the historical past. As a result of historical past is written by the victorious, and we Palestinians are misplaced on this formulation.
“Then the United States took over from France and Britain as the big imperialist country. So it’s a big game and we Palestinians feel very small. We are not strong enough to fight this fight. Big powers stand in our way — we need the support of ordinary people in the world.”
The last word purpose
In the case of the US, I requested Mansour what he needed Individuals to know concerning the scenario, when their authorities has been supporting Israel militarily, financially, diplomatically and in shaping its narrative.
“This is the big problem because the United States is the main factor here. And if they change their policy, everything could be changed here. But there is a policy of keeping the American people uninformed. You keep them in the dark all the time. And the Americans I know tend to think that the United States is the world. So they don’t care about anything else. But for us, this is a big problem. This attitude of theirs is killing us.”
And if Individuals do recognise their complacency and push for a change of coverage, what does Mansour hope would be the final result?
“The long run is peace. Peace between Palestinians and Israelis. Possibly beginning with the two-state answer with the assistance of Egypt and Jordan. I personally don’t care how, I simply need peace. I’ve been dwelling all my life on this turmoil and slaughter and it’s an excessive amount of for the folks in it. All people desires a break. However I’m certain on the finish will probably be one state that individuals are dwelling in with equal rights. I believe that is the primary goal for each sensible human being, whether or not they’re Israeli or Palestinian. That is the one manner we will reside on this land.
“I have feelings about Jaffa, about Haifa, about Acre, about the sea, and I wouldn’t live in a country where I couldn’t visit these places. And I’m sure the Jews have feelings about the sea and many places in — they call it Judea and Samaria — in the West Bank, and so on. We Palestinians understand that here there were Jews before. We don’t deny their existence as they do our existence.”
Regardless of the violence of Hamas’s assault on southern Israel on October 7 and the brutal Israeli invasion of Gaza that adopted, Mansour holds on to that hope for peace and equality.
“I’m not Hamas. Hamas came yesterday and I’ve been here for many years. Hamas came because of the occupation. And my friends and the Palestinian people — they are very peaceful. They hate fighting. They hate war. It’s not that we love to make wars. We hate it and would love to live as normal human beings — in peace. That’s our ultimate aim.”
So what’s the artist to do in occasions of battle or battle, I requested him. He’s been at it for 50 years, capturing the spirit of Palestinian wrestle and sumud.
“In my case,” he replied, “I believe I’m siding with the appropriate facet of historical past and I’m doing my finest in my skill to indicate that. I don’t suppose there’s a formulation for what artists ought to do. However they need to be truthful with their emotions, and they need to really feel with different folks. I can simply go and work in my studio and neglect about anything and make flowers and good ladies and make exhibitions and promote and so forth. However that’s not how I’m constructed. And artists mustn’t try this. They need to be extra energetic of their society.
“I believe in art as a social instrument, not as decoration for wealthy people’s houses.”