Within the aftermath of the Punjab Kings’ (PBKS) slim defeat towards Mumbai Indians (MI) on the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2024, veteran cricketer Harbhajan Singh has voiced his frustration on the workforce’s unsure batting order.
PBKS, who fell quick by 9 runs in a carefully contested encounter, confronted criticism for his or her decision-making in the course of the match.
Harbhajan Singh slams Punjab Kings administration
Harbhajan, recognized for his candid opinions, minced no phrases as he dissected the PBKS’ efficiency, significantly specializing in their batting strategy. Expressing bewilderment over sure choices, Harbhajan questioned the rationale behind sending Sam Curran to open the innings, a transfer that raised eyebrows amongst cricket fanatics and pundits alike. “What was the point of sending Sam Curran to open?” queried Harbhajan, highlighting the unconventional resolution made by the PBKS’ workforce administration.
Sam Curran, a gifted all-rounder, failed to supply the specified begin on the prime of the order, contributing to PBKS’ early setbacks.Bhajji additional lamented the dismissal of Prabhsimran Singh, who fell sufferer to a dangerous pull shot, exacerbating PBKS’ woes. Regardless of the dismissals of Curran and Prabhsimran coming off deliveries that won’t have appeared significantly threatening, Singh emphasised the necessity for a extra calculated strategy in such conditions.
The previous Indian cricketer additionally acknowledged the brilliance of the supply that noticed the again of Rilee Rossouw, describing it as “sensational.” Nevertheless, Harbhajan’s frustration peaked when discussing the batting place of Liam Livingstone, a participant famend for his ending prowess. “But then you sent Livingstone as a batter who plays the role of finisher,” remarked Harbhajan, highlighting the perplexing resolution to deploy Livingstone greater up the order.
Historically, Livingstone occupies the quantity six place, thriving within the function of a finisher, a indisputable fact that Harbhajan reiterated throughout his evaluation of the match.
“What was the point of sending Sam Curran to open? Prabhsimran got out while trying to pull. I can understand that both players got out on not-so-dangerous deliveries. Then the delivery that got Rilee Rossouw out was sensational. But then you sent Livingstone as a batter who plays the role of finisher and whenever he is the captain, he goes on no. 6 because he plays the role of finisher,” stated Harbhajan on his YouTube Channel.
Additionally READ: Preity Zinta dejected, Gerald Coetzee ecstatic – PBKS vs MI encounter witness contrasting feelings after Ashutosh Sharma’s dismissal | IPL 2024
Third successive defeat for Punjab Kings
Within the match the place MI posted a formidable whole of 192/7 on the scoreboard, PBKS managed to muster 183 runs earlier than being bowled out in 19.1 overs. The efforts of Harshal Patel with the ball, claiming three essential wickets for PBKS, have been overshadowed by the batting unit’s lack of ability to chase down the goal set by MI.
As PBKS reassess their methods and regroup for the challenges forward in IPL 2024, the questions raised by Harbhajan function a poignant reminder of the necessity for readability and consistency of their strategy, significantly in essential encounters towards formidable opponents.