Following the controversial incident that resulted in Fernando Alonso receiving a 20-second penalty on the Australian Grand Prix, Sky Sports activities F1’s Karun Chandhok offers his verdict.
Alonso was penalised by the stewards for “potentially dangerous” driving in entrance of George Russell earlier than the Mercedes driver crashed in a dramatic conclusion to Sunday’s race.
The Aston Martin driver was handed a 20-second time penalty for the best way during which he approached Flip Six on the penultimate circuit, dropping him from sixth to eighth within the last classification – a choice issued by stewards greater than three hours after the top of the race.
Following the post-race investigation, which included the research of information, replays and interviews with each drivers, stewards stated telemetry from Alonso’s automobile confirmed that the Aston Martin had “lifted slightly more than 100m earlier than he ever had going into” Flip Six on the penultimate lap of the race as Russell chased him down.
Alonso claimed that he was merely attempting to make sure a greater exit from the upcoming nook, with Russell making use of heavy strain because the pair approached the DRS zones during which the Mercedes driver, on more energizing tyres, would doubtless have had his finest likelihood of overtaking.
The stewards stated they didn’t have enough data to find out whether or not Alonso’s manoeuvre was meant to trigger Russell issues, however finally concluded that he had contravened the regulation which states: “At no time may a car be driven unnecessarily slowly, erratically or in a manner which could be deemed potentially dangerous to other drivers or any other person.”
Alonso was handed a 20-second time penalty for the incident in lieu of a drive-through given the race had already completed. He additionally had three penalty factors utilized to his previously-clean superlicence.
The 42-year-old Spaniard wrote on social media that he was “surprised” by the choice and recommended the format of the circuit was accountable, citing different examples the place he believes he defended in the identical method.
Chandhok analysed the incident throughout Sky Sports activities F1’s post-race protection, however that was earlier than the stewards’ resolution had been made. A day on, the previous Lotus and HRT driver shared his newest ideas:
Has your view modified?
“There’s a way to drive tactically, and there’s a way that that goes slightly beyond what is being judged as fair, and in this instance, it feels like that was the case.
“If I have a look at Alonso’s instance of Imola 2005 that he cited, that was good tactical driving by him, positioning the automobile in the proper place on the proper time, slowing the nook entry to get a greater exit. However it was accomplished in a in a predictable method, and I believe that’s the key phrase right here, predictable.
“Lots of people have referenced Kevin Magnussen’s driving in Jeddah, questioning the way it was okay for him to deliberately decelerate the sphere there, however Alonso bought accomplished for the transfer in Melbourne.
“There was a predictability in what Magnussen was doing. He was driving in a tactical way, slowing down mid-corner in long radius corners where there was only one line, so nobody had the opportunity to overtake him. But it was done in a way that the cars behind knew what he was doing.
“In Fernando’s case, taking a look at among the GPS information as effectively, what’s fairly clear is, in distinction to his personal driving in the previous couple of laps, he appeared to again off and brake considerably earlier on this lap after which accelerated and braked once more. And that is the place the unpredictability got here in for George.
“I think any driver on the planet would have obviously tried to brake early to get a good exit, I think where this perhaps crossed the line is it was so much earlier, so much so that he in fact had to speed up again.”
How difficult was it for Russell?
“While George didn’t make contact with Fernando, that wasn’t actually what put him out. The front wings on F1 cars are so, so sensitive.
“George bought unexpectedly shut – for those who anticipate to be that shut, within the cockpit you’ll alter your velocity, you may alter the best way you are driving the automobile.
“It is mainly like for those who have been driving behind one other automobile and abruptly the grip simply disappears like a change, like your entrance tyres abruptly contact some black ice. That is what occurred to George.
“You can always help yourself, but I think given how different it was on that lap, in contrast to the previous few laps, I think George could cut himself some slack because he would not have expected Fernando to have backed off so much earlier. I think he would have expected Fernando to back off a certain amount earlier, but not as much as that.
“David Coulthard really remembered that Alonso did an analogous transfer to him on the Nurburgring in 2003 and he ended up off the monitor as effectively!”
Did the stewards make the right decision?
“I believe they bought it proper. There’s an argument to say that if he purposely had him off, possibly you need to be penalised extra. Equally, on the flip facet you could possibly say, they did not make contact, so ought to he have been penalised in any respect.”
Does it influence Alonso’s future?
“No, I don’t think so. Fernando is a ruthless, brilliant and smart competitor.
“Alonso is a tricky competitor who has a form of win-at-all-costs method. And I assume any crew who indicators him up is signing him up for that. So I do not suppose it has any influence on the longer term.
“I think whatever happens the future, will be a decision independent of this incident in Melbourne. I don’t think a single incident like this will make a team sign or not sign a driver.”
How will the drivers cope with it in Japan?
“Normally, one of the drivers will raise the question, probably George, I guess, and then it will be up to the race directors.
“It is fairly an ungainly state of affairs on the Driver’s briefings as a result of the conversations occur between drivers, however through the chair, through the race director. So it is going to by no means be directed one driver to a different, will probably be directed to the race director within the case of, ‘if this occurs once more, what is going to you do? What do you suppose? What’s your view on it?’ That form of stuff.
“So there could be a slightly awkward conversation, I imagine. But it’s not anything that’s not happened before in F1. There’s been incidents and awkward conversations at briefings for probably half of each season.”
Formulation 1’s largest ever season continues with the Japanese Grand Prix, dwell on Sky Sports activities F1 from April 5-7. Stream each F1 race and extra with a NOW Sports activities Month Membership – No contract, cancel anytime
Get Sky Sports activities on WhatsApp!
Now you can begin receiving messages and alerts for the most recent breaking sports activities information, evaluation, in-depth options and movies from our devoted WhatsApp channel!
Discover out extra right here…