Taipei, Taiwan – Eleven years in the past, Rex How, author, writer, translator, editor, and then-cultural adviser to the Kuomintang (KMT) authorities of President Ma Ying-jeou, decided that may change the course of his personal life, and the way forward for Taiwan.
On June 20, 2013, How posted a letter on social media alerting the Taiwan public to the deliberate closed-door signing of the Cross-Strait Service Commerce Settlement (CSSTA), a free commerce deal that may open up Taiwan’s service trade – which represents about 70 p.c of its gross home product (GDP) – to Chinese language funding.
As the small print of the settlement grew to become clear, many in Taiwan’s civil society warned that the deal would advance financial absorption by China and compromise the island’s political sovereignty.
How later resigned and supported scholar activists 9 months later after the invoice was rushed via the legislative evaluation course of by Ma’s China-friendly KMT. That scholar motion grew to become what’s now recognized in Taiwan because the Sunflower Motion, or the 318 scholar motion, commemorating the day the 23-day occupation of the legislature started.
The motion helped pave the way in which for the Democratic Progressive Social gathering’s (DPP) presidential and legislative victories in subsequent elections and reinvigorated the island’s politics with a brand new, youthful era of politicians and events.
However on this 12 months’s election, many former activists and motion events misplaced of their districts. Ko Wen-je’s Taiwan Individuals’s Social gathering (TPP), which proved widespread amongst Taiwanese youth as a practical, anti-establishment selection past typical political divides, changed the Sunflower-era New Energy Social gathering because the third most-represented get together within the legislature with eight seats.
So what has modified in Taiwan since How alerted the general public to the CSSTA? In his new e book, Taiwan Unbound: A New Chapter, How explains the dissonance between generations in Taiwan as a metaphor for the island nation’s obedient, unmoving mountains and the adaptive, unconfined sea.
How, a toddler of Chinese language immigrants to Korea, moved to Taiwan when he was 18 and constructed a profitable profession within the publishing trade. In the present day, he’s the founding father of the award-winning publishing home Locus Publishing, chairman of the Taiwan Worldwide Guide Truthful Basis, and a passionate participant in initiatives throughout civil society. And regardless of his help of younger activists and his earlier tenure below Ma, he says he has no loyalties to any get together.
“I’m a citizen. We are the owners of this country,” he mentioned. “So we have to monitor [the government]. Otherwise, who will watch them?”
Al Jazeera spoke with How on the motion’s 10-year anniversary to study extra about up to date Taiwanese politics and the resonance – or lack thereof – of the Sunflower Motion with Taiwan’s youngest era.
This interview has been edited for size and readability.
Al Jazeera: Why did you resolve to alert the general public concerning the CSSTA?
Rex How: It was June 2013. I learn the newspaper and I discovered there was information that the federal government goes to permit mainland China printers to come back to Taiwan, they might spend money on Taiwan to do printing. So I used to be very stunned. And at the moment, I used to be the adviser to President Ma Ying-jeou. I by no means heard that he had such a plan and nobody within the authorities talked about that they have been going to signal a particular settlement with China. So I wrote a letter to the president and CC’d the letter to the international minister. I instructed them that it was a very flawed choice. And it’s crucial that I want to speak to them, I wish to allow them to know why it’s so harmful for Taiwan publishing and even freedom of speech. However I didn’t get any reply from President Ma or anybody within the cupboard.
After which once more, I learn information that mentioned very quickly, our authorities will open many doorways for various areas of Chinese language trade to spend money on Taiwan. I acquired so anxious, so I saved asking. And sooner or later I had a chat with the minister of tradition at the moment with another publishers. We requested her, what is that this settlement about and what’s going to occur? And he or she mentioned even she didn’t know.
After which I spoke with the minister with out portfolio and I requested when it was going to be signed. He mentioned in Shanghai, on the night of the twenty first of June of 2013. So I noticed that there was nothing I may do. I can solely write an article to put up on my Fb and alert the those who there are solely 24 hours left for us to precise our disagreement with the federal government. So I wrote that article, and it acquired an enormous response. Nevertheless it didn’t work. They didn’t hear. So individuals got here out to the streets to protest and that was the start of the anti-CSSTA motion.
Al Jazeera: What sort of impression do you assume the Sunflower Motion had on Taiwan in the long run?
Rex How: The Sunflower Motion was a abstract of all of the social actions that occurred in Taiwan earlier than. The KMT was the goal, however truly, it gathered all of the momentum of different social actions prior to now years, together with the environmental one, together with ones concerning the media, land justice, human rights within the navy, and so forth.
So conserving Taiwan’s independence economically from China was on the floor. However on the backside, within the depths, I recognised that the motion was a couple of generational hole. The brand new era’s acknowledgement of the world, of economics, of Taiwan, the whole lot is totally different from the era earlier than. In the present day after 10 years, the DPP appears to be away from the youthful generations. And that’s why Ko Wen-je claims [he is] taking extra care of the youthful era.
Al Jazeera: Inform me just a little bit about your new e book, Taiwan Unbound: A New Chapter.
Rex How: My e book began truly 10 or 12 years in the past. At the moment, I noticed that so many social actions started in opposition to the federal government and nearly each motion was both initiated or participated [in] by the younger individuals.
At the moment, the KMT authorities [saw] that every one these actions in opposition to them have been supported by the DPP, in order that they thought that the younger individuals have been manipulated by the DPP. However I didn’t agree with that as a result of I watched all these actions evolve. And what I imagine is that there’s not a battle between political events. There are conflicts between generations.
[I saw] these variations between the generations as a metaphor: the modifications on the land look like the modifications of the mountain and valley, the desert and grass. The mindset is totally different from mountain to valley, from grass to abandon, however they’ve one thing in frequent: They’re on the land. Till a sure cut-off date, that was the distinction between each era. However at a sure level, the modifications of the generations grow to be completely totally different. So I exploit metaphors like from land to sea. I noticed that in Taiwan that time of time was 1987 as a result of that 12 months, we lifted martial regulation and Taiwan grew to become a democratic society or nation.
The which means of the lifting of martial regulation is the media grew to become free – we had newspapers booming, TV stations, cables and particularly radio stations. We are able to hear, we will hear, you possibly can watch and you’ll learn so many issues that have been taboo, that have been prohibited earlier than. So it’s a very totally different world, Taiwan after 1987. I assumed individuals born after that have been like individuals within the sea. The way in which to stay and survive within the sea is totally different from the way in which to stay and survive on the land. On the land, you need to train your legs. However within the sea, you need to learn to swim, the way to sail a ship, not solely to run up the hills or stroll within the desert. So since 10 years in the past, I felt all these sorts of protest actions have occurred within the sea.
So the true factor is the way to hear to those sorts of voices, which have been totally different from the earlier generations’; the way to acknowledge their wants, the way to acknowledge their anger. The KMT didn’t discover this. They didn’t settle for this, they solely thought that every one these younger generations have been risen by the DPP. So eight years in the past, within the election, they only collapsed. That they had a giant loss to the DPP at the moment.
Al Jazeera: 10 years after the Sunflower Motion, many members of [the post-Sunflower movement party] New Energy Social gathering (NPP) joined the DPP. And on this election, the DPP tried to current itself as representing the younger individuals by working these Sunflower-era politicians. And so they weren’t all profitable. Do you assume now there’s even a disconnect between the Sunflower era and the brand new younger era?
Rex How: Sure. If we proceed to make use of my metaphor of land and sea, 10 years in the past, the ocean was shallow. However after eight years, after two elections, there’s a deeper sea. Individuals born after the 12 months 2000 are totally different from the individuals who have been born in 1987 like [those in the] Sunflower Motion.
Al Jazeera: So they’re more durable to achieve?
Rex How: They’re totally different. Identical to Lin Fei-fan [a former Sunflower Movement leader] instructed me, he doesn’t perceive what younger individuals below 30 are considering as a result of they’re utilizing totally different media. KMT, they use media like newspapers or TV; DPP, Sunflower Motion, the principle media they use are blogs and Fb. In the present day, younger persons are not utilizing blogs and Fb, they’re utilizing IG, YouTube, brief movies, TikTok. If you find yourself utilizing totally different media meaning that you’re in a distinct world … in my metaphor, younger persons are within the deep sea, and they’re crying for assist that somebody may assist them to sail a ship, assist them survive within the sea. And no one got here to them moreover Ko Wen-je.
All the opposite candidates didn’t present [up] within the media that they’re utilizing. What Ko Wen-je did was sail a ship to the deep ocean, however he saved on altering his costumes to play totally different roles. You by no means know who he actually is, what he actually believes. What he mentioned within the night is totally different from the morning. Typically he says [President] Tsai Ing-wen is a troublemaker, however generally he says he’ll comply with her diplomatic insurance policies. However for the younger individuals, he’s the one candidate that they’ll attain, they’ll see, they’ll watch. And the ways of Ko Wen-je are very intelligent. In my e book, I discussed that he employed six to seven YouTubers to assist him resolve what he would say at present. The one factor he is considering is quantity on the web. So he doesn’t thoughts if he’s saying one thing totally different. So long as the quantity may be raised, he’s glad to try this.
Al Jazeera: Do you assume that’s sufficient for the TPP to remain related in politics? He additionally campaigned on being this anti-establishment determine. However now, the TPP has eight seats within the legislature. They’re turning into a part of the institution, they usually’re going to need to outline their values and vote on issues. Possibly that may flip some voters away as a result of they heard him say one thing totally different?
Rex How: As you noticed, Ko acquired the least votes in Taipei Metropolis. So all of the residents in Taipei, they knew what he did, who he was. So he can solely mesmerise individuals outdoors of Taipei. There’s a saying that “all of the Ko haters were once Ko fans”.
I don’t know if he’ll final. I solely know that I don’t assume it’s actually a celebration. It’s a one-man get together or one-man present of Ko Wen-je. In the long term, I actually don’t assume [the TPP will last] due to Ko Wen-je’s mindset, he has an emperor’s mindset. He admires Mao Zedong – you realize that, proper? And when he acquired elected the primary time 10 years in the past as Taipei mayor, he went on a pilgrimage to Yan’an. He has a really pleasant mindset towards China.
Al Jazeera: There haven’t been many massive scholar actions prior to now a number of years. There hasn’t actually been one thing much like what occurred in Hong Kong in 2019, or in Taiwan in 2014, this sort of instant existential menace to Taiwan, not like through the Sunflower Technology. Do you assume that will have additionally helped Ko Wen-je and harm the DPP?
Rex How: Individuals are very straightforward to overlook. So some younger individuals at present, possibly they forgot, or they even didn’t know what occurred in Hong Kong 4 years in the past. Another excuse is that as a result of the DPP gained the election 4 years in the past by elaborating on this level, some persons are criticising them like hey, you don’t know the rest, possibly the DPP is sweet at utilizing form of fears however they didn’t pay that a lot consideration to the younger era.
However I believe that’s a mistake. We must always all the time let individuals know that each election in Taiwan is expounded to China. There’s all the time an invisible candidate – China – that’s all the time invisible however collaborating. Twenty years in the past, in 1996, they used bombs, missiles to threaten us. After which they tried to make use of the cash to purchase us like what they did in Ma Ying-jeou’s authorities. And now, they’re utilizing cognitive warfare. Cognitive wars have been omnipresent on this election.